PILF Applauds Supreme Court Decision in DNC v. Brnovich

The Court Adopts PILF’s Framing of Voting Rights Act

(Alexandria, VA) – July 1, 2021: Today, the Supreme Court issued a decision on a case interpreting the Voting Rights Act, DNC v. Brnovich. In a 6-3 decision the Court ruled Arizona’s ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct vote policy do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. This landmark ruling has made it clear that Section 2 violations require a causality analysis.     

“Today’s decision is a clear victory for election integrity,” said PILF President J. Christian Adams. “The Court’s ruling that disparate impact analysis cannot be used for a Section 2 violation is significant in allowing states to run their own elections and pass election integrity reforms without interference from federal courts. This decision will ensure that there must be a causal connection between a state election practice and actual denial of a vote on account of race versus a disparate impact. In December of 2020, the Public Interest Legal Foundation filed a brief on behalf of itself and former Department of Justice Civil Rights Division officials arguing that this casual connection was necessary for the intrusion into states powers. We are extremely happy to see that the Court has adopted our framing of Section 2 The Court obliterated the idea that there must be demonstrable voter fraud to enact a law to deter and prevent it.  This is a big blow to the vote fraud deniers who have turned to the courts to make our elections less secure.”    

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is a 501(c)(3) is the nation’s only public interest law firm dedicated wholly to election integrity. The Foundation exists to assist states and others to aid the cause of election integrity and fight against lawlessness in American elections. Drawing on numerous experts in the field, PILF seeks to protect the right to vote and preserve the Constitutional framework of American elections. PILF has brought lawsuits and won victories in Texas, Mississippi, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and across the United States.

###

Related Posts

H.R. 4: Personnel is Policy

H.R. 4: Personnel is Policy

July 2021 -- Personnel is policy. Every time you hear about the need to pass H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, remember: Congress isn’t just passing a new set of rules—it is empowering scores of DOJ Civil Rights Division (“CRT”) Voting Section...

PILF Intervenes to Protect Georgia From DOJ Abuse of Power

PILF Intervenes to Protect Georgia From DOJ Abuse of Power

PILF is the First Group to File a Motion to Help Georgia (Alexandria, VA) – July 6, 2021: The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a motion to intervene to help defend Georgia’s election integrity law against the Department of Justice lawsuit. The Department...

PILF Applauds Supreme Court Decision on Donor Privacy

PILF Applauds Supreme Court Decision on Donor Privacy

Blow to Kamala Harris’ Intrusion into Private Information (Alexandria, VA) – July 1, 2021. Today, the Supreme Court issued a decision on the donor privacy case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation and Thomas Moore Law Center v. Becerra. In a 6-3 decision, the Court...

Public Interest Legal Foundation